View Single Post
Old 07-25-2014, 04:47 PM  
aka123
Confirmed User
 
aka123's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: 64 00 N, 26 00 E
Posts: 4,450
Quote:
Originally Posted by theking View Post
They had been supplied weapons...primarily by Russia...and had some of Russia's top of the line weapons of war. They were poorly trained and did not have the will to fight for Sadam. America forces had state of the art weapons of war and are very well trained.

The Russians are once again supplying Iraq with weapons of war.
Like what top of the line weapons? They had T-72s and some Scud's, neither top of the line at the time. Not useless, but far from top of the line.

The fighting will is very important, and Iraq's poor fighting will isn't something that US can boast about. Like I said, fighting against a proper army is a totally different matter. For starters against an army that fights back.

Operation well done, no one denies that, but hardly a "trophy fight".

Last edited by aka123; 07-25-2014 at 04:54 PM..
aka123 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote