Quote:
Originally Posted by WarChild
There's no better way to show the World you don't really understand science than to make a silly statement like this.
Let me give you a quick little lesson. Instead of typing it out, I'm just going to cut and paste somebody else's words.
|
I'm indoors and on my laptop now so I an reply in detail.
I worded my comment like that because regardless of the historical use of both terms, law and theory, man-made global warming is neither.
But global warming alarmist expect the other side to disregard that because they know better about that, laws and theories.
My style of arguing that sort of logic is to apply the same logic back, that's why I also point out the fact that the scientific method is being perverted with this science is settled mantra because, you know, 97% of a bunch of people knocked knocked on each other's research a few years ago so end of discussion.
not only does that smack of elitism, it's wrong. But worse, as I mentioned above, it absolutely halts any opportunity to sway the other side to come around to what global alarmists want them to do.
