I don't agree...
climate "science" is pretty damn close to religion... with any other science, you make a hypothesis, do some tests, get results, tweak it, retest, etc... and any results can easily be verified by your peers...
with climate science on the other hand, you look at perhaps 100 years worth of data, make up some assumptions, make up a model and try to understand how climate changed over millions of years... and on top of that you try to predict what will happen over the next million years...
so you basically have free reign to make shit up, as there is no possibility to verify if either your assumptions are true, or if your predictions are true...
all these climate "scientists" are barely able to predict if it will rain next weekend or not... and yet you expect them to predict temperature on earth in 1000 years?
I'm not saying that there is nothing to it, but it's far from a solid science... and with strong financial motivation to keep "global warming" hypothesis going, we need to take what these "studies" conclude with a grain of salt...
