Can any one here see the similarities here or is it just me?
The Aryan gave up the purity of his blood and, therefore, lost his sojourn in the paradise which he had made for himself. He became submerged in the racial mixture, and gradually, more and more, lost his cultural capacity, until at last, not only mentally but also physically, he began to resemble the subjected aborigines more than his own ancestors.... Thus cultures and empires collapsed to make place for new formations.
Blood mixture and the resultant drop in the racial level is the sole cause of the dying out of old cultures; for men do not perish as a result of lost wars, but by the loss of that force of resistance which is contained only in pure blood.
All who are not of good race in this world are chaff
In conjunction with his racial ideology and antisemitism, Hitler often spoke of an "historic" or "higher mission" of the Aryan race and its elite core, the German people. The Aryans, according to Hitler,
were once rulers of the earth, the highest race of mankind, endowed with the highest degree of spiritual qualities and the only ones capable of producing a higher civilization.19 Aryans were, in essence, god-men on earth, but through blood poisoning lost their ruling position. However, as its "higher mission," the German people were destined to regain this position for the Aryan race. To do so, Germany must restructure its political and social foundations and create a state whose function was to promote the Aryan culturecreating "spiritual elements" that exist in the blood of the German race. If this were done, racially and thus spiritually pure human beings could be produced,
ensuring Aryan world domination
Hitler's racial ideology stemmed from what he called "the basic principle of the blood." This meant that the blood of every person and every race contained the soul of a person and likewise the soul of his race, the Volk. Hitler believed that the Aryan race, to which all "true" Germans belonged, was the race whose blood (soul) was of the highest degree. God Himself had, in fact, created the Aryans as the most perfect men, both physically and spiritually.4
Since the blood (soul) of the Aryans contained specific spiritual energies, the "cultural energies" or "racial primal elements,"5 as Hitler often called them, the Aryans supplied the culture that creates the beauty and dignity of higher humanity. In other words, all that man calls higher culture was ultimately the product of the spiritual and creative energies that exist in the blood of the Aryans. Hitler stated:
WOW
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amputate Your Head
All races have endured slavery at one point or another. Black do not have a monopoly on that. And in case you selectively forgot, it was the whites in the U.S. that put an end to slavery here. Yet that continually is glossed over and the focus remains on how "evil" whites are.
What is Affirmative Action if not racism against whites?
But I bet you defend that don't you.
No anti-Whites say a 100% Black area needs more diversity.
No anti-Whites say a 100% Asian area needs more diversity.
No anti-Whites say a 100% Muslim area needs more diversity.
No anti-Whites say a 100% Indian area needs more diversity.
Why is it that every White country on the planet must become ?more diverse??
Why is it that no area is allowed to be ?too White??
Why is it that non-White groups are allowed to remain untouched by ?diversity??
When it comes to ?diversity?, anti-Whites make two distinctions:
1. Anyone non-White is ?diverse?, and 2. anyone White is not ?diverse?.
?Diverse? simply means a place without any White people in it.
So every time they talk about a ?lack of diversity?, they have said what their object is : a place that becomes less and less White ? which is genocide.
That?s why diversity is a codeword for White genocide.
?No white person will be allowed to own land? in Zimbabwe says Mugabe; ?Whites will never come back?.
ALL White countries and ONLY White countries are being flooded with millions of third world non-whites, and Whites are forced by law to integrate with them so as to ?assimilate,? i.e. intermarry and be blended out of existence.
Massive immigration and forced assimilation is genocide when it?s done to Tibetans in Tibet, and it?s genocide when it?s done to Whites in White countries, by UN Convention:
?Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part?
Those carrying out White Genocide SAY they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amputate Your Head
But white countries are for "everyone". And if we don't go along with the genocide of whites, we are labeled "racist". Tell me, what is so wrong about wanting to preserve MY race? Why must MY race die, so that others may take all I have worked for?
.
|