Quote:
Originally posted by JMM
No no no..I'm sorry, you didn't read Nike's law properly. There is not much room for interpretation in Nike's law:
"Fuck it, if he has got enough private land around him, he should be able to do what the fuck he likes."
I should be able to do what the fuck I like and I should tell the homeowners association to fuck off.
Gregg said he interviews models daily, I would assume he shoots at least half as often as that, or close. You don't see impact there? Look again.
As for your statement that what Gregg is doing can't be considered a violation of local zoning laws because there is no impact on traffic is just 100% wrong. It IS a violation of local zoning laws. If he wants to challenge those laws, he can, but as it stands RIGHT NOW, it IS a violation. There is more to zoning laws than simply traffic impact.
|
No, actually that IS all there is to zoning laws regarding "home offices". I have another business that is run from my partners house. We checked into local zoning laws before we did it. Nice try though. What is considered "excessive traffic" is obviously open to interpretation though.