|
Too lazy to set a custom title
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Punta Cana, DR
Posts: 29,590
|
last items :
Quote:
Iraq:
Iraq, rich in oil on the one hand and internally torn on the
other, is guaranteed as a candidate for Israel's targets. Its
dissolution is even more important for us than that of Syria.
Iraq is stronger than Syria. In the short run it is Iraqi power
which constitutes the greatest threat to Israel. An Iraqi-Iranian
war will tear Iraq apart and cause its downfall at home even before
it is able to organize a struggle on a wide front against us.
Every kind of inter-Arab confrontation will assist us in the short
run and will shorten the way to the more important aim of breaking
up Iraq into denominations as in Syria and in Lebanon. In Iraq,
a division into provinces along ethnic/religious lines as in Syria
during Ottoman times is possible.
So, three (or more) states will exist around the three major
cities: Basra, Baghdad and Mosul, and Shi'ite areas in the
south will separate from the Sunni and Kurdish north. It is
possible that the present Iranian-Iraqi confrontation will
deepen this polarization.
Saudi Arabia:
The entire Arabian peninsula is a natural candidate for
dissolution due to internal and external pressures, and
the matter is inevitable especially in Saudi Arabia.
Regardless of whether its economic might based on oil
remains intact or whether it is diminished in the long run,
the internal rifts and breakdowns are a clear and natural
development in light of the present political structure.
Jordan:
Jordan constitutes an immediate strategic target in the short
run but not in the long run, for it does not constitute a real
threat in the long run after its dissolution, the termination
of the lengthy rule of King Hussein and the transfer of power
to the Palestinians in the short run. There is no chance that
Jordan will continue to exist in its present structure for a
long time, and Israelīs policy, both in war and in peace,
ought to be directed at the liquidation of Jordan under the
present regime and the transfer of power to the Palestinian
majority. Changing the regime east of the river will also
cause the termination of the problem of the territories densely
populated with Arabs west of the Jordan. Whether in war or under
conditions of peace, emigration from the territories and economic
demographic freeze in them, are the guarantees for the coming
change on both banks of the river, and we ought to be active in
order to accelerate this process in the nearest future. The
autonomy plan ought also to be rejected, as well as any compromise
or division of the territories for, given the plans of the PLO and
those of the Israeli Arabs themselves, the Shefa'amr plan of
September 1980, it is not possible to go on living in this
country in the present situation without separating the two
nations, the Arabs to Jordan and the Jews to the areas west
of the river.
Genuine co-existence and peace will reign over the land only
when the Arabs understand that without Jewish rule between
the Jordan and the sea they will have neither existence nor
security. A nation of their own and security will be theirs
only in Jordan.
Within Israel the distinction between the areas of '67 and
the territories beyond them, those of ī48, has always been
meaningless for Arabs and nowadays no longer has any
significance for us. The problem should be seen in its
entirety without any divisions as of '67. It should be clear,
under any future political situation or military constellation,
that the solution of the problem of the indigenous Arabs will
come only when they recognize the existence of Israel in secure
borders up to the Jordan river and beyond it, as our existential
need in this difficult epoch, the nuclear epoch which we shall
soon enter. It is no longer possible to live with three-fourths
of the Jewish population on the dense shoreline which is so
dangerous in a nuclear epoch. Dispersal of the population is
therefore a domestic strategic aim of the highest order;
otherwise, we shall cease to exist within any borders.
Judea, Samaria and the Galilee are our sole guarantee for
national existence, and if we do not become the majority
in the mountain areas, we shall not rule in the country and
we shall be like the Crusaders, who lost this country which
was not theirs anyhow, and in which they were foreigners to
begin with.
Rebalancing the country demographically, strategically and
economically is the highest and most central aim today.
Taking hold of the mountain watershed from Beersheba to
the Upper Galilee is the national aim generated by the
major strategic consideration which is settling the
mountainous part of the country that is empty of Jews
today."
|
__________________
I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !
But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....
|