|
Too lazy to set a custom title
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Punta Cana, DR
Posts: 29,589
|
Just sticking to the original plan ...
it is well documented :
http://www.amazon.com/Zionist-Plan-M.../dp/0937694568
And we are seeing one of the phase in Iraq today : the splitting of the country ...
Quote:
In 1982 the Hebrew-language magazine Kivunim (Directions), the
official organ of the World Zionist Organization published an
important article entitled, "A Strategy for Israel in the
Nineteen Eighties". The Editor of Kivunim is Yoram Beck,
Head of Publications, Department of Information, of the
World Zionist Organization. Also on the Editorial Committee
of Kivunim is Amnon Hadary, a member of the Palmach during
the 1948 atrocities. Israel Shahak, professor of organic
chemistry at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, and chairman
of the Israeli League for Human and Civil Rights translated the
article into English and wrote the following foreword to it. It
was published in 1982 as a pamphlet by the Association of
Arab-American University graduates. Professor Shahak states:
The following essay represents, in my opinion, the accurate and
detailed plan of the present Zionist regime for the Middle East
which is based on the division of the whole area into small states,
and the dissolution of all the existing Arab states. I will comment
on the military aspect of this plan in a concluding note.
Here I want to draw the attention of the readers to several
important points:
1 . The idea that all the Arab states should be broken down,
by Israel, into small units, occurs again and again in
Israeli strategic thinking. For example, Ze'ev Schiff,
the military correspondent of Ha'aretz (and probably the
most knowledgeable in Israel, on this topic) writes about
the best that can happen for Israeli interests in Iraq :
"The dissolution of Iraq into a Shi'ite state, a Sunni
state and the separation of the Kurdish part" (Ha'aretz,
2/6/1982). Actually this aspect of the plan is very old.
2. The strong connection with neo-Conservative thought in the
USA is very prominent, especially in the author's notes.
But, while lip service is paid to the idea of the defense
of the West from Soviet power, the real aim of the author,
and of the present Israeli establishment is clear: To make
an imperial Israel into a world power. In other words, the
aim of Sharon is to deceive the Americans after be has
deceived all the rest.
3. It is obvious that much of the relevant data, both in the
notes and in the text, is garbled or omitted, such as the
financial help of the US to Israel. Much of it is pure
fantasy. But, the plan is not to be regarded as not
influential or as not capable of realization for a short
time. The plan follows faithfully the geopolitical ideas
current in Germany of 1890-1933, which were swallowed whole
by Hitler and the Nazi movement, and determined their aims
for East Europe. Those aims, especially the division of the
existing states, were carried out in 1939-1941, and only an
alliance on the global scale prevented their consolidation
for a period of time.
Israel Shahak Kivunim's plan states that all the Arab states are
fragmented as follows:
"The Arab Muslim world, therefore, is not the major strategic
problem which we shall face in the Eighties, despite the fact
that it carries the main threat against Israel, due to its
growing military might. This world, with its ethnic minorities,
its factions and internal crises, which is astonishingly
self-destructive, as we can see in Lebanon, in non-Arab Iran
and now also in Syria, is unable to deal successfully with its
fundamental problems and does not therefore constitute a real
threat against the State of Israel in the long run, but only
in the short run where its immediate military power has great
import. In the long run, this world will be unable to exist
within its present framework in the areas around us without
having to go through genuine revolutionary changes. The Moslem
Arab World is built like a temporary house of cards put together
by foreigners (France and Britain in the Nineteen Twenties),
without the wishes and desires of the inhabitants having been
taken into account. It was arbitrarily divided into 19 states,
all made of combinations of minorities and ethnic groups which
are hostile to one another, so that every Arab Moslem state
nowadays faces ethnic social destruction from within, and in
some a civil war is already raging. Most of the Arabs, ll8
million out of 170 million, live in Africa, mostly in Egypt
(45 million today).
Maghreb States:
Apart from Egypt, all the Maghreb states are made up of a
mixture of Arabs and non-Arab Berbers. In Algeria there is
already a civil war raging in the Kabile mountains between
the two nations in the country. Morocco and Algeria are at
war with each other over Spanish Sahara, in addition to the
internal struggle in each of them. Militant Islam endangers
the integrity of Tunisia and Qaddafi organizes wars which
are destructive from the Arab point of view, from a country
which is sparsely populated and which cannot become a powerful
nation. That is why he has been attempting unifications in the
past with states that are more genuine, like Egypt and Syria.
Sudan:
Sudan, the most torn apart state in the Arab Moslem world
today is built upon four groups hostile to each other, an
Arab Muslim Sunni minority which rules over majority of
non-Arab Africans, Pagans and Christians.
Egypt:
In Egypt there is a Sunni Muslim majority facing a large
minority of Christians which is dominant in upper Egypt:
some 7 million of them, so that even Sadat, in his speech
on May 8, expressed the fear that they will want a state
of their own. something like a second Christian Lebanon
in Egypt.
Syria:
All the Arab States east of Israel are torn apart, broken
up and riddled with inner conflict even more than those of
the Maghreb. Syria is fundamentally no different from Lebanon
except in the strong military regime which rules it. But the
real civil war taking place nowadays between the Sunni majority
and the Shi'ite Alawi ruling minority (a mere 12 % of the
population) testifies to the severity of the domestic trouble.
Iraq:
Iraq is, once again, no different in essence from its neighbors,
although its majority is Shi'ite and the ruling minority Sunni.
Sixty-five percent of the population has no say in politics,
in which an elite of 20 percent holds the power. In addition
there is a large Kurdish minority in the north, and if it
weren't for the strength of the ruling regime, the army and
the oil revenues, Iraq's future state would be no different
than that of Lebanon in the past or of Syria today. The seeds
of inner conflict and civil war are apparent today already,
especially after the rise of Khomeini to power in Iran, a
leader whom the Shi'ites in Iraq view as their natural leader.
Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Oman and North Yemen:
All the Gulf principalities and Saudi Arabia are built upon a
delicate house of sand in which there is only oil. In Kuwait,
the Kuwaitis constitute only a quarter of the population. In
Bahrain, the Shi'ites are the majority but are deprived of
power. In the United Arab Emirates, Shi'ites are once again
the majority but the Sunnis are in power. The same is true
of Oman and North Yemen. Even in the Marxist South Yemen
there is a sizable Shi'ite minority. In Saudi Arabia half
the population is foreign, Egyptian and Yemenite, but a Saudi
minority holds power.
|
Oded Yinon
__________________
I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !
But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....
|