Originally Posted by dyna mo

that's a good question, man, it is odd to me also. It seems to boil down to the old debate of guns don't kill people, people kill people, they think the gun killed those people.

It's the same peeps who want to relinquish more of their freedoms based on psychology.

So maybe it's a deflection from the fact that psychology failed here. This guy was immersed in psycho-therapy- multiple therapists, daily sessions, family participation, police interviews.

not one bit of that neither 1) helped the guy nor 2) intervened on the murderous rampage.


yet the anti-gunners want psychologists to decide personal property matters.