Quote:
Originally Posted by crockett
No I'm telling you that at that moment in time, the shooting officers had no proof of what he was accused of doing. They had only speculation of what was told to them over the radio and it's usually only radio codes at that with very little detailed information. I'm telling you that it doesn't matter what the guy did prior to ending up there, that is for the courts to decide.
The only information that should be taken into account at the time he was gunned down, is what he did at that moment to cause the officers to shoot him. Clearly it's shown that the crime he was shot for, was "running". You can try to claim he did this and that before hand but that is all speculative. That is how our laws are supposed to work.. However in this case and many others the police just act as judge, hurry and executioner because they get away with it.
|
no, he was shot because he escalated the sitatuation to be out of control and confusing.
I'm not trying to claim he did this or that, as you describe, in fact, I'm one of the few here trying to stick to the few facts that are indisputable here.