Quote:
Originally Posted by CyberSEO
I see what you are talking about but.. the price of what tactical nuke missile like "Яхонт" (SS-N-26 Strobile) is nothing comparing to the USS which will be sink with 99% probability (it's almost impossible to intercept something that flies 10 meters under water with 720 m/s speed)  |
Well, you would have to close enough to use it, would be hard considering the sonar in the US is far better than that of Russia. Carriers always travel in groups. The computer on the carrier can orchestrate the weapons of all the ships in it's group for it's protection. And if you are that close, would you really want to shoot a nuke? The distance one of those can travel is limited.
Which is why the US doesn't use nuke torpedo's
Subroc made better sense
__________________
Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
think about that