Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSquealer
I don't expect anyone here to read above the 3rd grade level so I am not shocked at your poor understanding of what was being discussed. I can only suppose there are too many big words for you.
. I said didn't know if RICO could apply to secondary infringement in any way or in the same way it can apply to primary infringement. I said I was too lazy to do the research to see if there are any possible arguments or circumstances which would pass the tests..... and as I've said, affiliates have been held liable plenty of times in mainstream for their contributory infringement which only takes 2 fucking seconds to verify.
Congrats in your attempt at reading, though. You were almost close.
|
Ok, so you make a claim and yet also admit that you haven't done the research to back that claim... but then you expect everyone else to believe that what you are saying is true, and when you're called on it you tell them to go look it up themselves.
You fail debating 101 my friend.
And not to mention, this entire thread is pointless, starting this thread was pointless and you have yet to really make any valid points that you can back up whatsoever. Perhaps you should go read the very first post in the thread titled "THIS is why you are not successful in Adult!" -- which, ironically enough, was posted by you -- and apply it to your own life instead of constantly trying to rub someone else' failure/mistake in their face a year or so after the fact as if it makes any fucking difference one way or another at this point in time.