View Single Post
Old 04-14-2014, 10:29 AM  
crockett
in a van by the river
 
crockett's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 76,806
Quote:
Originally Posted by sperbonzo View Post
This federal land-grabbing is happening all over the US.

http://www.ijreview.com/2014/04/1291...tire-property/


"Now that the federal government has decided to retreat from the heated battle over Cliven Bundy?s cattle, we can all breathe a sigh of relief, right? Maybe not.

A Colorado couple, Andy and Ceil Barrie, are battling Summit County commissioners who decided to seize their mountainside property via eminent domain. Why? To preserve the acreage and protect the wildlife.

[The] battle is a unique test of private property rights. Unlike in countless other cases, where local governments have used those powers to seize land to make way for a road or some economic development project, Colorado?s Summit County is using eminent domain to go after the Barries? land simply because officials want the open space.

Two years ago, Andy and Ceil Barrie bought two pieces of land: a house in an established subdivision, and another piece of property at a higher elevation, accessible by an old mining road.

The Barrie?s property is surrounded by 2.2 million acres of White River National Forest. It includes an old mining cabin, an outhouse and a shuttered gold mine.

The trouble began when the U.S. Forest Service got after the couple for using a utility vehicle to drive from their home to the cabin. All on their own private property, mind you.

Summit County then tried to buy the property ? but the Barries didn?t want to sell. That?s when the county played its trump card:

Unbeknownst to the Barries, the previous owner had remodeled the cabin without permits. So county commissioners voted to condemn the property for wiring and plumbing ? even though the cabin has none ? and filed for eminent domain.

As for the eventual outcome, the Barries aren?t optimistic:

?I understand that we are all trying to save these beautiful mountains and make them accessible to everyone, but you know that property has been sitting there since President Garfield signed our land patent, and we?re not doing anything bad there,? Ceil Barrie said.

Asked if recent mediation pointed to a way for the coupleto keep the land in the family name and avoid eminent domain, Andy Barrie responded flatly, ?No, they?re taking it.?

The Barries say they have no plans to develop their property or sell it.

So, should the government be able to confiscate private property because of what might happen ? vs. what is happening? You make the call."




Meanwhile the feds are set to take over another 5.2 MILLION acres this year alone.

Why? And where the hell did they come up with the power to do that?



.


.

Now this kind of thing is obviously bad and a abuse of power. It would be one thing if the family was trying to strip mine, clear cut the Forrest or what have you and the govt wouldn't let them trying to protect the land. However eminent domain has been abused for years and years so this kind of thing is nothing new.

In my opinion if the federal, state or local govt uses eminent domain to take someone's land, then they should have to pay fair market value. If they actually had to pay the fair market value you can sure as hell bet there would be a hell of a lot less abuse on both the state and local govt level. Might not change it on the federal level but at least some change would be good and it's mostly abused at state and local levels anyway.
__________________
In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.
crockett is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote