Quote:
Originally Posted by _Richard_
i see.
so you're saying, that because CO2 exists in nature, it is 'not pollution'
with that logic, nothing is pollution, because it was always 'a part of nature'?
The definition of pollution is:
the presence in or introduction into the environment of a substance or thing that has harmful or poisonous effects.
and your position is, because it already exists, the massive increase we are causing 'isn't pollution'.
please feel free to correct me where i am mistaken.
|
You are mistaken in believing that CO2 has harmful or poisonous effects. The three images I posted above demonstrate the exact opposite.
The fact that the alarmists and their acolytes in the media have convinced people that CO2 is a pollutant will go down as one of the greatest feats of propaganda of our time.