Quote:
Originally Posted by Sly
Let's just say that it was true. The majority of the United States population lives in large urban environments, the major cities. The second group lives in smaller cities or close to smaller cities, which have grocery stores. The third group lives in extreme rural areas, that may or may not have "access to food"…
|
I understand this. I am saying how come those rural areas can support few restaurants and at the same time no grocery store?
From investors point of view - there is X number of people that is needed for grocery store to be viable investment. And there is Y number of people needed for restaurant investment being viable. X is smaller than Y. And you talk not even about single restaurant and 0 grocery store, but about few restaurants and 0 grocery store.
That is just difficult to imagine. I mean if few restaurants are being profitable in that area it certainly means that one grocery store would be profitable as well. Very profitable... Yet nobody invests in a grocery store there for some reason
