Quote:
Originally Posted by galleryseek
If you make illegal, certain activities that *might* result in victims even if said victim is theirself, then you've created a legal precedent to create thousands upon thousands of laws. The type that say it's illegal to consume a 16oz sugary soda drink as they tried doing in NY.
The most logically consistent approach is one that's in line with the non-aggression principle (ie; no victim, no crime).
|
Agreed! Make no mistake when an activity is made illegal that *might* result in victims, it is not for our protection or "the greater good" it is for MONEY. These prisons are run by private companies and make a shit load of money on each and every prisoner. If someone who is hopped up on 'this or that' commits a crime that results in a victim (which is already punishable by the way) then they should be dealt with under the rules of the law.
Besides, are we free or aren't we? Not so much it seems.