Quote:
Originally Posted by Due
I think this is a good start towards having absolute health coverage.
In the end it will make the country a safer place since many of the nut jobs and wackos will get the treatment they need to function instead of living in a dumpster or on the streets.
Good health and treatments will increase the life quality for yourself and everyone around you..
|
Due, I'm not sure that the govt. is planning on rounding up homeless bums and giving them "help" because of ObamaCare.
Matter of fact...there won't be ANY bums (the crazy types with long beards and signs by the road) signing up for Obamacare.
The problem this is facing right now is the fact that there are still going to be 40 million people uninsured.
There were two main objectives of "ObamaCare":
1. To get everyone insured
2. To bring prices DOWN by $2,500 per family
It's not doing either thing.
And has been pointed out...the govt. REFUSES to give the numbers of how many people that signed up did not already have insurance. And they won't give the numbers of how many people are paying for it (as opposed to free medicare obamacare). And they won't give the numbers on how many people are getting "subsidized" (meaning that their neighbors are paying for it).
My guess is that the whole thing is designed to fail to move us towards a "single pay" system.
Don't know if that's a good thing or not. I've been told differing things by my friends in Canada.