Quote:
Originally Posted by DamianJ
Yes, I made a tiny little totally unimportant error when I said WOMAN rather than WOMEN.
You, on the other hand, claimed "female voters were forcibly turned away" when in fact, they weren't at all, and the source you claimed backed up your spurious nonsense, didn't back you up in the least.
But carry on if you think it will help you look less pointless.
|
no, its wasn't a spelling mistake now was it?
Quote:
Originally Posted by DamianJ
You are claiming women (plural) were refused the right to vote because of how they were dressed. Your laughable source said ONE woman was TRIED to be turned away.
|
You just didn't bother reading it properly, you got carried away with your blinkered right-on views and just merrily prattled way for post after post failing to realise you was on a quicksand of self-delusion. I've already posted my source numerous times (sorry it isn't in internet format) but even if you had seen the interview, whatever it is that ticks in your brain would have just let it disappear into your enormous blind spot as it would obviously be some kind of cheap Union Jack flag waving propaganda. If it doesn't appear in print in the Socialist Worker then it never, ever happened did it, eh?