Quote:
Originally Posted by CyberSEO
Do you really think it is a better comparison? Personally I don't think so and many here will agree with me, because Dotcom's acuity was legal in New Zealand (where he gonna be extradited from).
But if you really want to talk about "poisoned cookies"... well, here we go: http://articles.mercola.com/sites/ar...rope-asia.aspx
Any extraditions followed, ah?
P.S. Yes, I know it's an off-topic, but I just had to answer to the woj's post. |
the point is not whether the analogy is better or not... but what do you think should happen in that situation?
let me give you another one: US hacker hacks the Moscow stock exchange which results in Russian companies losing Billions... it's obvious who the perpetrator is, plenty of evidence against him, he even brags about it acting like a big shot, etc...
what should happen in that situation? obviously nothing would happen
, but in an ideal world how should it play out? should he get extradited, or US should protect him and nothing should happen?