Quote:
Originally Posted by faxxaff
I understand, but keeping evidence from a defendant means there is no way for him to know all charges. Looks very fishy to me. They might get him extradited for this, but then bring other charges against him once he is on US soil. It's similar to the problems Wikileaks people and international bankers are facing.
|
When he is arraigned he will be told the charges against him and he can plead guilty or not guilty. If he pleads not guilty he has every right to see the evidence against him; that right is guaranteed him. He hasn't gotten to the part where he gets to see state's evidence yet.
He isn't a defendant yet.