Originally Posted by Relentless

Interesting stats...

Originally Posted by Relentless

Originally Posted by DamianJ

Sure. But it doesn't really matter what you *think*. JT tested it, it massively failed.

Originally Posted by DamianJ

So, you're saying he is lying.

Interesting.

Originally Posted by DamianJ

I believe everything JT has to say about selling membership websites.

Have you considered that simply offering ANY secondary payment option would change ratios?

No? Didn't think so.

Carry on.

Originally Posted by DamianJ

I think everyone who doesn't have a turnip instead of a brain doubted it, actually.

Originally Posted by DamianJ

I consider 3 options when reading your posts:

1) you are drunk
2) you are high
3) combination of 1 and 2

Originally Posted by DamianJ

Not only that, but just take their geo billing script by keeping it looking exactly the same and popping a new badge on it!

But either way, it's OK, he's just on a high/drunk rampage. Again. And he won't be able to stop himself posting nonsense about me, and I'll get him banned. Again.

Originally Posted by SCORE Ralph

Interesting read. Since testing for the past 3 weeks, our results are somewhat better.
40SomethingMag went from 1:718 to 1:599;
XLGirls went from 1:713 to 1:633;
Scoreland went from 1:562 to 1:454.
February isn't a great month to test change of options, specially with shorter month and V-day right smack in the middle, but even so, our results were not so bad.

Originally Posted by DamianJ

No fee at this stage, that was a freebie showing you the sort of thinking I do. If you want to talk about working together in the future, feel free to email me damianjennings gmail

Originally Posted by beaner

That's very exciting thinking!

Can we get back to bitcoin discussion causing damage, or not causing damage?