View Single Post
Old 07-08-2003, 04:41 PM  
Centurion
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: SeATtle
Posts: 6,033
Quote:
Originally posted by RefaStud
Seeing as how Dems take so much stock in the UN.
United Nations Environment Programme
Sources of SO2

Natural sources of sulphur dioxide (SO2) include release from volcanoes, oceans, biological decay and forest fires. Actual amounts released from natural sources in the world are difficult to quantify; United Nations Environment Programme estimates a figure of between 80 million and 288 million tonnes of sulphur oxides per year. Sulphur dioxide emissions also result from combustion of fossil fuels due to varying amounts of sulphur being present in these fuels. World-wide emissions of SO2 are thought to be around 69 million tonnes per year (2000) and nitrogen oxides around 24 million tonnes per year (1990).


Even At the lowest amount of natural pollutants we still do not produce as much as the natural enviroment around us.

I am still trying to find the Article in the Journal of Science Stating that the Mount St. Helens Eruption Produced More Harmful Pollutants than We have put into the Enviroment since the Dawn of the industrial age!

Still Waiting on Yours!
Ah! That was fast! Here's the SECOND way already.
The Right Wing when cornered will respond with some off the topic point from some unknown person/source!

A treatis on the amount of sulfer dioxide given off by volcanos by a nameless person/persons from the U.N.

And this addresses the way we're going to deal with the "greenhouse" effect HOW?

(Note..nothing you posted there disputed the "greenhouse effect!"..If ANYTHING..it ADDED to the argument!)
Centurion is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote