Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo
Why do you think so? Fill me in, I'm open.
|
The primary reason is it would mean that we can only field less than a hundred thousand active members of the Combat Arms to confront all possible contingencies this world has to offer. In other words less than a hundred thousand combatants is a ridiculously small number of combatants.
In addition here are other ways to reduce military spending without reducing warm bodies.