Quote:
Originally Posted by DVTimes
Sorry.
But thats somthing people say. The other rubbish people say is that porn tube quality is not as good as paysites as its quality drops when made to flash format and so people will pay for the quality.
What rubbish.
People do not care about quality. They want instant release.
Besides your content is going to be on 1000000's of sites for free.
Your just kidding yourself if you think people expect to pay for porn.
But feel free to charge, and have all the problems of charge backs, % to affiliates, % to ccbill, % to visa, plus security and so on, plus all the problems will people posting your content and re-selling there passwords.
There is no reason why adverts and so on could not make you far more money.
Let me ask you a simple question, if you could make more from giving your content away than you are selling memberships, which would you do?
|
I'm not saying people expect to pay for porn. I'm saying they will if they want something bad enough and can't find it anywhere else. That goes for any product. You're painting everyone with one broad brush, and they're not all after the same thing when they look at porn.
The kind of person who doesn't think something should be paid for probably doesn't make anything of value. So in your estimation, nobody gives a shit about quality? I'm not talking about tech quality. I mean intangibles, like something special in the way its shot, the level of hotness of the girls, the sexual intensity. So everything that's ever created will just make x dollars on advertising? I think someone who slaves and labors over any kind of art will put some kind of value on his hard work.
But the idea of a certain percentage of someone's product being free has to be good in the long run for business. If its good, it will sell the better stuff. I mean for anything, not just porn.