Originally Posted by seksi

What I think & (my experience bears out) is better is a mix of non-nude and softcore that clearly signals what you get from purchasing the membership. That way affiliates stay clear of any secondary producer 2257 liabilities and you can focus on unique text descriptions and personal testimonials. I also think cropping to remove the focus on graphic sex works well and stars/blurring is cheesy. But that's experience with my own galleries, FHG's from sponsors were a waste of time for me. Everyone had them. I suppose FHGs would be useful today in avoiding 2257 secondary producer problem, but it would hard to find a sponsor provided gallery that I could endorse and through traffic at.

I saw very few actual affiliate mangers for sites I would probably promote at internext. I interviewed a couple of new faces that will have really compelling sites to promote when they have affiliate programs, if they ever need those at all.