GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post

sexeducation · 07-07-2003, 04:32 PM

= = = = = = QUOTE BY GothWeb = = = = = = = = = = = =
You run a site that, by default, has a good deal of explicit content on it. You encourage parents to show that site to their children. Sure, they could change their browser settings, but you're still effectively encouraging minors to look at porn. Another rationalization.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

By "default" for many years the graphics were automatically off.
The viewer had to choose to turn them on - I go default all graphics to off again.

I try to keep the ratio of 50% teen (no explicit sex) and 50% adult. It is a "complete" sex education magazine. If I had the bucks and because of recent mis-interpretations - I see the need to split SexEducation.ORG into the non-explicit site AND SexEducation.TV into the explicit site .... once again ... I require a constant and consistent supplier in order to make those changes.

NO I DO NOT ENCOURAGE CHILDREN (THOSE WHO ARE NOT YET REPRODUCTIVELY CAPABLE) TO VISIT MY WEBSITE IN ANY MANNER FOR ANY REASON.

I DO ENCOURAGE ADULTS(PARENTS) TO REVIEW AND PRINT SOME OF THE ARTICLES ON THE WEBSITE.

I do not target children.
I do not target teenagers.

However, I am aware unlike other EVEN MORE GENERIC domains t hat teenagers would rather read about sex to learn about it - the discuss it with their parents. The link of this study is on my website some where.

Anys suggestions on improving the wording of my website is appreciated - but I would question whether stronger wording would actually be effective for the purpose of the "stronger" wording..

07-07-2003, 04:32 PM
sexeducation So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Calgary - Alberta - Canada Posts: 7,315	= = = = = = QUOTE BY GothWeb = = = = = = = = = = = = You run a site that, by default, has a good deal of explicit content on it. You encourage parents to show that site to their children. Sure, they could change their browser settings, but you're still effectively encouraging minors to look at porn. Another rationalization. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = By "default" for many years the graphics were automatically off. The viewer had to choose to turn them on - I go default all graphics to off again. I try to keep the ratio of 50% teen (no explicit sex) and 50% adult. It is a "complete" sex education magazine. If I had the bucks and because of recent mis-interpretations - I see the need to split SexEducation.ORG into the non-explicit site AND SexEducation.TV into the explicit site .... once again ... I require a constant and consistent supplier in order to make those changes. NO I DO NOT ENCOURAGE CHILDREN (THOSE WHO ARE NOT YET REPRODUCTIVELY CAPABLE) TO VISIT MY WEBSITE IN ANY MANNER FOR ANY REASON. I DO ENCOURAGE ADULTS(PARENTS) TO REVIEW AND PRINT SOME OF THE ARTICLES ON THE WEBSITE. I do not target children. I do not target teenagers. However, I am aware unlike other EVEN MORE GENERIC domains t hat teenagers would rather read about sex to learn about it - the discuss it with their parents. The link of this study is on my website some where. Anys suggestions on improving the wording of my website is appreciated - but I would question whether stronger wording would actually be effective for the purpose of the "stronger" wording..