View Single Post
Old 07-07-2003, 10:12 AM  
TheJimmy
ICQ- five seven 0 2 5 5 0
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 10,747
my thoughts are I think they're fucking clowns that need a smack down for wasting a lot of time and money on that rediculous claim...

didn't someone try that same shit with 'framed' pages a few years back?

I guess someone ought to copyright a "." and get some lawyers on the case...a lot of people keep using "." and I'm a big abuser myself............................................ .


I consider it almost like trying to patent/trademark/copyright anything terribly common, ie: the display of html and images over the internet, someone should dig up the first person/company to do that shit and go extorting money from all the websites online for using their 'streaming of text & graphics' through their HTML technology that they built.....what is the internet if NOT streaming shit....and if truely they were the first ever to build this technology then why didn't they start the C&D's from day one??????

why wait until almost a decade later to start going after media sites???? were all their lawyers stoned or on vacation?




just another sharkish company trying to leach some milk off the Internet tit....
__________________
Investor with 5m - 15m USD to invest. Do you have a site or network of sites earning 50k - 200k a month income? Email your contact and preliminary data to: domain.cashventures (at) gmail.com....Please...no tire kickers...serious offers and inquiries only.
TheJimmy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote