Let's see, I agree that the RepubliCrats have conspired to set-up a quasi 2-party system that makes it incredibly difficult for any but the two major party candidates to be elected (and if any of the current smaller parties were to win the Presidency, they would meet similar or even greater resistance from Congress).
The difference is that I seek solutions instead of just bitching and moaning all the time (which many Libertarians seem to prefer to actual change).
When I proposed to you a potential solution (
Proportional Representation) to the dilemma of the two-party monopoly, you rejected it out of hand, without explaining how such a change to the system of electing representatives would adversely impact the Libertarian party (in fact, the Libertarian Party, as much as I disagree with them, would actually benefit tremendously from proportional representation).
After 40+ years, the Libertarian Party is still about 49% short of the 50+1% of the votes needed to get elected to create change, so please explain to everyone how the Libertarian party expects to realistically close that gap (I won't even start with how utterly ridiculous the Libertarian party is once you get past their "Freedom Good, Government Bad" slogans, and realize that Libertarianism is not a very viable form of government).
I know that the 1% that vote Libertarian like to arrogantly call everyone else fools, but to many of us that did look deeper into Libertarianism and reject it, it honestly appears that you are just carrying water for the capitalist oligarchy personified by the Koch brothers.
ADG