Quote:
Originally Posted by vdbucks
I'm not entirely sure what you actually said but here you go:
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2372609,00.asp
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817...obref=obinsite
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817...obref=obinsite
The Mac operating system predates Windows by nearly two years. However, the hardware platform known as the PC (uneducated people refer to Windows and "PC" as though they were synonymous) predates the Mac hardware platform by three years.
I don't recall ever arguing that the Mac Chassis' aren't visually appealing. I mean, my Bitfenix Prodigy case more or less replicates what a mini mac pro would look like (if it were black). But, visually appealing as they may be, Macs have the same hardware inside as PCs do.
Intel, Nvidia, ATI, Samsung, Foxconn. None of those companies make superior product lines specifically for Mac, nor do they make inferior product lines specifically for PC.
The only difference between an Intel cpu in a Mac and an Intel cpu in a PC is the price Apple charges you. Same thing for memory, HDD/SSD and graphics.
|
you simply refuse to see the basic point.
ITS NOT ALL ABOUT HARDWARE. ONLY A PERSON WHO BUILDS MACHINES WOULD THINK THAT AND MOST DONT.
if it was company that sold cheapest box of loose hardware would dominate.
i have mac and windows machines for specific purposes based on requirements and price nothing more.