Quote:
Originally posted by wonton
Gee. That's all it takes to dissociate a supposed arch-criminal from the president of the United States, eventhough their families are in bed together? Because his brother calls him a "black sheep"? I mean really. That's all it takes? The surrounding concomitant facts have no bearing at all on your assessment of the situation? For christ's sakes...
|
Jesus H. In simper terms for you. At the time the two families did business, Osama was not even known of. The Bush and Bin Laden business partnership dates to 1976 when Bin Laden's family invested $50,000 into an energy company called Abusto.
Now, you're saying that Bush should protect a family member of a former business partner his father had over $50,000 because the families did business with each other almost 30 years ago?
I brought up the "black sheep" because you were trying to imply the media made it up. I told you where it came from, and you act like I'm implying that's why there's a disassociation. I was just telling you what you didn't know.
Answer this, yes or no, no bullshit in-between. Do you believe Osama Bin Laden is the head of Al-Queda and is responsible for numerous terrorist acts around the world? Simple answer yes or no.