|
The wife of one of my friends was a junior high art teacher for 30 years. She retired with full benefits at age 52.. The lady she replaced is still alive and still getting benefits from that job and naturally there is another younger lady now teaching that class. So the state is paying 3 people for that one position.
Why should a union teacher be able to retire at 52 when the non-union workers have to wait until they are at least 62 for partial benefits.
__________________
You might not be as anonymous as you think you are.
|