Quote:
Originally Posted by Sarah_Jayne
In the case of heroin, there are entire towns in the UK that were pretty much ruined by it. The last time I was in Nottingham, parts of the town looked like a scene from the Walking Dead. Meth was starting to take its place when I left.
I don't spend enough time in small town America to know if that is echoed here and cities like LA have enough different corrosive factors that drugs just blend in with the others.
Of course there are functioning drug users. I think most of us agree that alcohol has been a bigger problem over time and appreciate the double standard that exists. That doesn't mean that other problems don't exist and that they shouldn't be handled.
I've come to think that the reason that weed gets labeled as a gateway drug isn't because it creates an addiction that is then transferred to other drugs. It is because once somebody does it and finds out that they have pretty much been lied to they then wonder what else has been a lie and try other things. Perhaps if we were more honest then the warnings of the truly dangerous would be more clear rather than muddled into a simple 'drugs are bad mmmkay' wag of the finger.
|
2 things.
the debate re: which is worse isn't mine, i simply attempted to clarify a point made in that debate here. while i am of the sort that thinks the bigger problems should be handled first, i'm not the type to disregard the lesser issues in an either/or faceoff.
my point is people in this thread seem to think 1 rip of a meth line and you are all the sudden on a downward spiral to a before and after photo after leaving a trail of destruction of everything and everyone around you.
that's just simply not even close to reality.