GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post

saratoga120 · 09-22-2013, 11:01 PM

Thanks again to everyone taking the time to offer me their considered guidance.

At this point, since the issue was brought up, some more disclosure. The footage does combine porno starlets having sex and a very major fetish, which has a devout, fanatical following. I won't exactly reveal it other than to say the site Southern Charms would probably have about 20-30% less content if this activity were deemed illegal.

So, the stuff is a goldmine. I post it regularly on a board that caters to this fetish, though only vidcaps to protect the viability of the original source material.

If we could veer away for the moment from the issue of restitution based on the absence of model releases toward the theoretical possibility of a vindictive reaction regarding the lack of 2257 paper work, might such an action by the starlet to contact law enforcement have legs?

That is, what would be the government's interest in following up on such a complaint? Would it be motivated to do so solely on obtaining information that such material was commercialized without proper documentation? Or would it need to conclude that the material was obscene in some way which runs afoul of community indecency standards?

Lastly, a topic I brought up midway through the thread hasn't been commented on yet and if anyone has any relevant opinions I'd be happy to hear them. Rather than spell it out again (I know you're all weary of my repeating myself as is), please do a search on the first page of this thread for the term en banc and comment on whether this effectively renders the 2257 statute unenforceable.

Thanks again for your time and insight. You've all been incredibly helpful.

09-22-2013, 11:01 PM
saratoga120 Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2013 Posts: 34	Thanks again to everyone taking the time to offer me their considered guidance. At this point, since the issue was brought up, some more disclosure. The footage does combine porno starlets having sex and a very major fetish, which has a devout, fanatical following. I won't exactly reveal it other than to say the site Southern Charms would probably have about 20-30% less content if this activity were deemed illegal. So, the stuff is a goldmine. I post it regularly on a board that caters to this fetish, though only vidcaps to protect the viability of the original source material. If we could veer away for the moment from the issue of restitution based on the absence of model releases toward the theoretical possibility of a vindictive reaction regarding the lack of 2257 paper work, might such an action by the starlet to contact law enforcement have legs? That is, what would be the government's interest in following up on such a complaint? Would it be motivated to do so solely on obtaining information that such material was commercialized without proper documentation? Or would it need to conclude that the material was obscene in some way which runs afoul of community indecency standards? Lastly, a topic I brought up midway through the thread hasn't been commented on yet and if anyone has any relevant opinions I'd be happy to hear them. Rather than spell it out again (I know you're all weary of my repeating myself as is), please do a search on the first page of this thread for the term en banc and comment on whether this effectively renders the 2257 statute unenforceable. Thanks again for your time and insight. You've all been incredibly helpful.