Quote:
Originally Posted by saratoga120
Morning Fitz. I've read through the latest responses and though not much more clarity exists from the previous night, I would like to comment on yours.
Remember, we don't even know that the starlet would find the release of this material objectionable. Perhaps she never looked better.
But assuming she saw the video and her reaction was "ewwwwwwwww! I can't believe people are going to watch me fuck that old fat pimply little geek!" we can also assume her outrage might turn into an effort at restitution.
Would I consider such a venture worthwhile if my personal assets were vulnerable? No way.
Would I let her bankrupt a corporation I'll be setting up, whose sole business interest is to monetize material I've shot on clips4sale? Yes, I would do that.
Do you or any of the other (mostly) helpful folks around here have insight into whether I'd only be risking the latter, but not the former?
I know I could go read a book, so tempting as that answer or some variation on it might be for a select few, you're liberated from having to say it.
|
Seriously...and I mean this as kindly as I can POSSIBLY say this:
You clearly ain't gettin' it.
So, go do whatever the hell you want, since you are not taking any advice, whatsoever, for any of us. What you risk, without having any legit documentation, is being sued by the chicks you shot...potentially issues with the government...and none of that is worth it, because {read my lips} YOU DO NOT HAVE ANY LEGIT DOCUMENTS FOR WHATEVER YOU SHOT.