Quote:
Originally Posted by fitzmulti
Uhmmm...even IF you forget the Feds...
What if the GIRL sues you for usage....the emails won't mean SHIT, because you have NO ID's, NO model release, no legitimate "signed" documents authorizing the use of the content.
I have been shooting adult material for TWENTY YEARS, and I don't "take the ball and run with it".
You are asking for opinions and advice....why the hell are you arguing with all of us?
I, as well, as some others {I am sure} have been approached by models years later, asking for content to be removed, used no longer, etc...and without the proper documents, they'd be able to win...but, the one {who recently} has tried that...has no, and I mean ZERO, legs to stand on....and her legs are gorgeous, by the way! ;-)
|
Morning Fitz. I've read through the latest responses and though not much more clarity exists from the previous night, I would like to comment on yours.
Remember, we don't even know that the starlet would find the release of this material objectionable. Perhaps she never looked better.
But assuming she saw the video and her reaction was "ewwwwwwwww! I can't believe people are going to watch me fuck that old fat pimply little geek!" we can also assume her outrage might turn into an effort at restitution.
Would I consider such a venture worthwhile if my personal assets were vulnerable? No way.
Would I let her bankrupt a corporation I'll be setting up, whose sole business interest is to monetize material I've shot on clips4sale? Yes, I would do that.
Do you or any of the other (mostly) helpful folks around here have insight into whether I'd only be risking the latter, but not the former?
I know I could go read a book, so tempting as that answer or some variation on it might be for a select few, you're liberated from having to say it.