Quote:
Originally Posted by notinmybackyard
Agreed
But unfortunately if this sort of thing happens all the time and 99% of the time nothing comes of it.
|
This is the opinion I am looking for. Not so much as because it is encouraging, but because it provides some real-life perspective on the situation.
But if the odds are 1% of criminal liability, I still don't like them.
Can others cite examples of an enterprise such as mine leading them down a path they wish they never set foot upon?
Again, it's important to note that there is absolutely no danger of anyone regarding the starlets as anything other than mature MILFs.
As far as potential civil damages go, I will have incorporated before releasing any of this material. The corporation will not be a sham, obviously designed to protect me from liability -- I will have a full stock of other, legally-obtained footage that will regularly be brought to market.
In this light, are my personal assets still vulnerable?
And, sorry to jump around, but what of stills, which show nothing more than female nudity? Again, I've photographed a mini treasure trove of girls in this context. No second parties in the photos, indeed no penetration of any kind. Do the same 2257 laws pertain to material of this nature?
I realize I'm leaning heavily on you guys to steer me right now. It's not for want of trying elsewhere. The web in surprisingly unhelpful. I can't even come close to getting a document to address something as simple as "obscenity law" and "{my state}." To add insult to possible injury, I couldn't even get a call back from a first-amendment lawyer after I informed his secretary that my inquiry regarded pornography in the jurisdiction and its permissible limits.
I suppose a trip to the law library is in order, but if anyone would like to recommend good source material, I'd devour it.