|
Ok gentleman. I am looking and listening carefully and appreciative of the time you are taking with me on this. Some of you might think I'm being obdurate, but I'm really trying to distinguish between that which is law, and that which is law that gets enforced.
So in that spirit, what might motivate the feds to make a federal case of hardcore porno with name-brand stars which does not include a 2257 disclaimer if it is clear that the participants are both in middle age?
And secondly, would a model sue for damages knowing she'd have to expose herself as a prostitute in order to collect?
|