09-11-2013, 06:37 AM
|
|
|
It's 42
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Global
Posts: 18,083
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bronco67
Why would anyone play devil's advocate for Assad, or give him the benefit of the doubt? He has lots of chemical weapons, the delivery system and reason to use them. It's a no brainer.
Does that mean we should get involved? I thought Obama made a good case last night. The Syria situation is more an indirect threat.
And you guys posting links from hack journalism sites like RT news and The Examiner doesn't help the conspiracy case at all.
|
Notwithstanding,"and reason to use them." Maybe, that should be rephrased:
and crazy enough to use them.
Other than that you are dead on.
I would really like to see this surrender of Assad's Syrian Chemical weapons (also including biological weapons (if they do exist too?)) but I am afraid this is just a cynical ploy to begin "negotiations" and indefinite delays.
Keep Assad on a very short leash ... |
|
|