Quote:
Originally Posted by RubyGoodnight
Now that we're on number four, I do wonder how long they'll keep the moratorium. (Well, those honoring it, I mean.) And how many more will come out as positive before it's all said and done.
|
I was hoping to hear something positive from FSC, today, and instead I just heard the news of a possible 4th HIV Positive person in the industry:
Quote:
Another porn star has revealed he has tested positive for HIV, the fourth such case reported in less than three weeks, RadarOnline.com has exclusively learned.
The male actor confirmed his diagnosis to the AIDS Healthcare Foundation, the largest nonprofit global HIV/AIDS organization in the world which is presently fighting for a statewide condom rule in California.
?I can confirm,? the organization?s president Michael Weinstein told Radar. ?However, he has asked that all other information be kept strictly confidential at this time.?
|
Has anyone heard anything from the FSC about this possible HIV+ #4, or do they just issue periodic press releases when they are not too busy?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Porno Dan
My attorney and I consulted and we decided that I will not shoot boy/girl as long as the moratorium stays in effect.
There is no reason we could not shoot since we do use condoms, but from a PR standpoint we will not be shooting.
|
You are a pioneer of sorts in the straight sector of adult, having switched from no condoms to condom sex.
However, I have some concern about the industry thinking that testing is unnecessary if we adopt mandatory condoms as a way to decrease the odds of any on-set HIV transmissions.
As I have recently learned, a segment of the industry already operates this way, and it seems like a recipe for disaster, given the unreliability of condoms.
ADG