Quote:
Originally Posted by Phoenix
there were two earthquakes that day?
i guess wtc7 was built with less regard to safety then the other buildings that were closer to the"earthquakes" had more debris hit them and took more of the shock.
i blame the unions
oh and the earthquakes
|
Sure, when both towers fell both of them registered as earthquakes. Common sense tells you this; Billions of tons of concrete fell at the same time. Twice.
Was WTC7 built with les regard to safety than the other buildings? Well, why is it that during earth quakes some buildings fall while others do not. During the Loma Prieta earthquake in 1989, some buildings in San Fran fell while a freeway structure fell in Oakland - yet thousands of buildings between the two areas weren't damaged at all. Why is that one section of the Bay Bridge fell, but not others, while the Golden Gate Bridge was fine? Let's not be childish here - Obviously different designs built at different times under different standards cause different amounts and kids of damage. In the case of WTC7, it was an obviously different design, it was on fire at multiple locations, debris from both the plane crashes had damaged it, and combined with the falling of billions of tons of concrete and steel and what not, the effects from two earthquakes taking place within a few hundred feet of the building, combined with debris from the the towers falling on the building... It would was been surprising that it didn't fall; It is surprising that more buildings didn't fall.
The amount of dis-information here on GFY is insane. Let's make a few claims, fail to back them up at all, and then accept them as truth. It's all bullshit.