|
I'm not pointing fingers at the gay side of the industry.
Matter of fact, it only makes sense that IF they have a group of performers who have all already tested positive for HIV and everyone knows it...they why would they give a shit if those particular performers do scenes together?
As long as any uninfected gay performers are not shooting scenes with them it doesn't really matter does it?
Testing nor condoms would be required for a sex scene with 2 guys or a group of guys who have already confirmed that they are all HIV pos
To test them or put condoms on would be downright silly.
So if that's what is happening...so what? Doesn't hurt anybody. The guys can take their pill everyday, outlive you and me, shoot their porn scenes together and live their lives.
But yeah, that is TOTALLY separate from the straight side of adult and should be treated as such.
And it IS treated as such.
That's why people are tested to shoot straight porn.
Just curious...what do you THINK the "industry" could possibly do differently?
Test every week? Everybody use condoms? Put chastity belts on all the talent when they leave the set? Lock them up in shed until needed to shoot...lol
You know better than that.
People will live their lives the way that they want to. And if they contract HIV their straight porn career is over.
So far the testing regimen has worked. It's caught the rare cases and stopped any spread throughout the general porn population.
If the "civilian" population had such standards...HIV would be almost non-existent today.
You said that the "current system is broken"...Well, I do think that it's bullshit that the testing companies are charging $130 for a $59 test, but other than that I'd say that this proves once again that the "system" worked to perfection and caught a case of HIV before it could become widespread.
Where am I wrong in this thinking?
|