Ah...you're still talking politics and think Obama is "better".
And I'm coming at this from the viewpoint that none of them are "better".
If spying, gun running, drone killing, irs targeting, military "surges", and now attacking a sovereign nation with no provocation isn't enough for you...then we must agree to disagree.
There's nothing really for us to discuss because we aren't even starting with the same premise.
I don't want to pretend that one of us is "right" and one is "wrong".
I'm just saying that we can't discuss it intelligently if we aren't at least starting from the same point.
Your posts seem to be insinuating that the United States federal govt. isn't doing anything wrong and "yes" we should attack another country without provocation and kill people with our bombs to "punish" the dictator for killing people (even though he will be eating a fine dinner and living a life of luxury while other people die from our bombs).
So we have to part ways in this discussion.
I am of the belief that
1. The U.S. is TOTALLY hypocritical (just look at what we did with Agent Orange in Vietnam).
2. It is an international crime to attack another country without provocation unless it is a UN sanctioned move (and we've already made that mistake with Iraq, how soon we forget)