Originally Posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude

More?

From the right (Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting):







A more thorough debunking:

http://antoningregoire.wordpress.com...-saudi-arabia/



I'll wait for further corroboration before drawing any conclusions, but to date, I do not feel there is a strong case for bombing anyone over the chemical weapons used in Syria, since there is still no conclusive proof about which group/faction is responsible.

With that said, it defies logic to me that Assad would have used chemical weapons at this point, and even less likely if he did, that he will use them again. What would be gained?

In my mind, the rebels would be more likely to have staged their own false flag operation to blame the Assad regime, and get the US and perhaps other nations to bomb the government.



ADG