Originally Posted by Rochard

Well, it's not like we haven't been lied to before huh?

Then we have the UN. Sometimes I believe the UN is nothing more than a pawn of the United States. Let's just say they are completely un-biased... Could they just be wrong?

There is lots of proof there was a chemical attack. But did the President of Syria athorize it? Did someone in the government launch the attack intentionally? Did someone in the Syrian military use the wrong shells? Did the rebels come across a cache of chemical weapons and not know what they were? Did the rebels come across chemical weapons, and knowingly use them hoping it would be blamed on the Syrian military?