|
As much as I do not like Berlusconi that Schulz leftist should have shut his mouth in the first place. After all, everything he said was basically just an ASSumption based on a huge title story in germany's biggest news magazine which came out just a day or two before the incident.
Or what _proof_ did Schulz have? I too believe that Berlusconi is guilty of a thing or two but he is democratically elected by the majority of Italians, and of all these trials none has found him guilty (yet). So while journalist etc. certainly can and will brag about this, and try to reveal more facts... , and courts will go on with their investigations, what the fuck did the member of EU parliament Schulz think when he - based on HEARSAY - accused the newly assigned Pres of EU with ridiculously vague yet slandering terms, without proof, publically, in the EU parliament?
Either have a case and bring it on, or shut the fuck up. It is certainly uncommon and NOT pc to do what Schulz did, and I am not aware of Schulz or the EU parliament being known as a place of revolutionary resistance or moral instance or whatever
So either yell at everyone who you THINK is questionable around there (I am sure there are quite a few) or shut up. Just picking Berlusconi because it seemed to be hip right now is so typical for a socialdemocratic moralist like Schulz. What about unguilty before proven guilty, and ... diplomacy?
|