Quote:
Originally Posted by edgeprod
He's pointing out the ridiculous logic in the Bible, not blaming anyone for anything. Gotta look at his context.
|
suggesting that the bible has anything to do with god is ridiculous logic IMO, suggesting that since bronze age tribesmen had a different concept of reality than modern science provides, proves there is no god is bad logic to me as well... you?
Quote:
I hope you don't take this the wrong way, but if you think god is hiding in one of the 11 dimensions of M-theory, the 10 dimensions of superstring theory, or the 26 dimensions of bosonic string theory, you're misunderstanding what those dimensions consist of, and why they're theorized to exist. They're not somewhere you can phase into and out of, we exist in all of them as part of our daily lives, if the theory is correct.
|
I pointed out m theory to nullify his argument that god is bullshit because we can't see god, because god lives in some bull shit dimension or other... pls read his arguments for no god... SO if m theory and the other theory's are correct or at least pointing to the right thoughts why would you suppose that nothing else will be found that will lead thought process into other directions? and why would you suppose that the new directions or thought lines would disprove a god anymore than those new lines of logic would prove a god? wouldn't that be an act or leap of 'faith' on your part?
Quote:
So you're saying "the absence of proof is not proof of absence?" This is a logical fallacy if i ever heard one. You're saying that not believing in flying unicorns because there's no proof is just as wrong as believing they exist? If there's no proof for something, the default is to not believe in it. There's no proof any sort of god exists, so why put any belief in it?
|
why believe the earth is not flat? why not believe you can't go faster than 35 mph in a train because the air will suck out and you'll die? why not believe that you'll never need more than 4 MB of memory? why not believe the Patten office should be closed because everything is invented? need I go on? I could do this all day... and so could you
the arguments against a god are as flimsy as the arguments for a god... 'schoenberg's cat'... you'll never know absolutely if there is a god until you die (i.e. open the fucking box) so it takes faith to believe in a god and faith to disbelieve in a god which is very different than' the absence of proof is not proof of absence' .. see?
