Quote:
Originally Posted by SilentKnight
If your loved ones were killed or had their limbs blown off by a terrorist bomber...would you want that prick's face staring out from the cover of an influential mag in every store across the nation?
As Harmon said - it's called sensitivity. I agree with those "idiots" in Boston who think it's sad and pathetic his face is on Rolling Stone.
|
I do understand your point. But Had it been my family or friends I would want to make sure that pricks life was as miserable as I could and if having his face on that magazine helps to consolidate the hatred of him in the US, then so be it.
The media loves to use us, why not use them?