Originally Posted by Yanks_Todd

So your argument in the first point is that what the dispatcher said is not what she actually meant? Ah, I see, a code. Well you got me there. I can't win that one dude. I guess my mistake is interpreting the words as per their definitions.

Glad you agree that T.Martin had that right. I agree that GZ did as well. And yes you can go up to someone and ask them what they are doing here. However if you were in a place you were allowed to be how would you respond? You may not hit them, fine, but don't tell me you wouldn't be put off by it and cop an attitude.

So now you have a keyed up dude with a gun. He wanted to be cop. (fact) and he was following someone who wasn't' doing anything wrong and was told to disengage by the authorities. The fact that he didn't disengage means that GZ thinks of him self pretty highly.

Trayvon does seem like a bit of a thug, however 17 year old boys tend to be a bit over aggressive and troublesome.

Now you have keyed up GZ thinking he is approaching a criminal and a pumped up Trayvon who has no idea who this dude is.

The problem is nobody knows how the rest really went down. Do you really think it was as neat as the guy who lived and was on trial said? I don't but what he said isn't acceptable. So the slight slide of his version to the truth means to me that GZ had NO RIGHT to do what he did.

Your homeless comment is a terrible analogy. The desire and state of the homeless person is pretty obvious.