Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSquealer
The jury will come back with a not guilty verdict.
For Rochard and others, it's very clear. If there is reason to doubt whether or not Zimmerman was justified in using deadly force, then they must find him not guilty. Nothing was proven beyond a reasonable doubt. All that was proven was that two jack offs cross patches, had a horrible misunderstanding and it escalated. It has not been proven beyond a reasonable doubt that Zimmerman committed 2nd Degree Murder. In fact, the prosecution hasn't really proven anything other than to cast a shadow on Zimmermans account of events... That however does not prove another specific version of events beyond a reasonable doubt.
|
For me it's always been clear. Three weeks of a trial did nothing to change my mind.
A twenty-nine year old wannabe police office working on getting his degree in criminal justice was trolling in the dark armed with a handgun and two flash flights and stalked an innocent kid for seventeen minutes without ever saying he was part of the neighborhood watch. The kid ran from Martin trying to avoid confrontation. Then we have Zimmerman saying "I walked towards him".