Quote:
Originally Posted by Mutt
My knowledge of this case mostly comes from this thread, haven't watched the trial.
This is a 'he said, he would have said if he were alive' case it seems, none of the evidence strongly proves or disproves Zimmerman's story and his story is all there really is.
BUT ..... that first 9-1-1 call with the cries for help in the background, if that was Martin's voice it is compelling and damning evidence against Zimmerman's story. Martin's mother identified the voice crying for help as her son's. Those cries came well before the fatal gun shot and they're pretty loud. You'd think with technology there'd be a way to determine whose voice that likely was. What was the testimony like regarding the identification of whose voice that was calling for help?
|
"In the last pre-trial hearing, Judge Debra Nelson ruled that technology used to identify voices heard on the 911 calls weren't valid and would not be allowed in court. Witnesses for both sides of the case have testified regarding whose voice they think is heard on that call."
that sucks, surely one of the media outlets has hired a professional expert with that technology to get their opinion - may not be admissable in court but in the court of public opinion it is.