Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo
the president is responsible for making sure "that the Laws be faithfully executed"
certainly going on public record only speaking to one side of an outstanding case is not allowing the law to be faithfully executed, it's swaying the court of public opinion in facor of one side.
the least he could have done was speak to both sides of the case, since he felt obliged to open his trap about it.
|
It doesn't make sense for the Executive office to remain neutral. In order to execute the law faithfully, one must make a decision on who is guilty, and then present their case in front of a judge/jury. The judicial system must remain neutral, not the Executor.
Furthermore, the DOJ is within the Executive branch...are you saying the DOJ must present both sides remain neutral also? If so, the DOJ would never be able to charge anyone with a crime, given that it has to remain "neutral".